Though the petitioner has obtained an order in W.C.No.167 of 2007 as early as 12.11.2010, she is yet to get the benefit of it as the third respondent is not complying with it till now. Under those circumstances, the petitioner has made a representation to the second respondent on 08.07.2014, seeking appropriate direction. The first respondent also has directed the second respondent to take appropriate action. Despite the same, no action is forthcoming and hence, the present writ petition.
2.Despite service of notice and the name of the the third respondent having been printed in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the third respondent.
3.It is very unfortunate that the claim petition was filed in the year 2007 and the order was passed in the year 2010. But, however, the petitioner, being a lady, aged about 70 years, is made to run from pillar to post. Thus a direction is issued to the second respondent to take appropriate action under the Revenue Recovery Act to see to it that the amount payable to the petitioner is recovered from the third respondent. The said action will have to be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4.With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
15.03.2017 Index:Yes/No mmi To
1. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour I, O/o.The Commissioner of Labour, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai - 6.
2. The Tahsildar, Mambalam Guindy Circle, Chennai - 17.
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
mmi W.P.No.29437 of 2016 15.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in