IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.NOS.48788-48794/2017 (LB RES) BETWEEN CHANDRASHEKAR R S/O R .RANGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRED SUB-DIVISION, SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT AT PRESENT ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BBMP, WHITEFIELD SUBDIVISION RAMAGONDANAHALLI, BANGALORE.
(BY SRI YATHISH J NADIG, ADV.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT 2ND FLOOR, 3RD GATE, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
... PETITIONER 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA KARNATAKA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (P.W.D.) 3RD FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
4. THE COMMISSIONER RURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT MULTI STORIED BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.
5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, KOLAR ZILLA PANCHAYATH KOLAR.
(BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR T.L, AGA.) ... RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE REPORTS SUBMITTED BY THREE MONITORING TEAMS AND ONE AUDIT TEAM VIDE ANNEXURE-A, B, C AND D TO THIS WRIT PETITION SUBMITTED AFTER VERIFYING THE WORKS EXECUTED UNDER MGNREGA SCHEME AT LAKSHMIPURA GRAM PANCHAYATH AND NELAVANKI GRAM PANCHAYATH OF SRINIVASAPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT AND ALSO QUASHING OF THE JOIN REPORT DATED 26.5.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-E SUBMITTED BY JOINT DIRECTOR (HORTICULTURE), SRI S GANGADARASWAMY SUBMITTED TO COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTED ON THE BASIS OF THE REPORTS AT ANNEXURE A TO D AND FURTHER QUASHING OF THE RECOMMENDATION/DIRECTION (DEMI GOVERNMENT LETTER) DATED 9.6.2016 SET TO KEEP THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH OTHERS IN SUSPENSION AND TO INITIATE DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY AGAINST THEM VIDE ANNEXURE-F ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER, RDPR DEPARTMENT (RESPONDENT NO.4) TO DC & CEO, ZP, KOLAR (RESPONDENT NO.5) AND LETTER DATED 14.6.2016 WRITTEN BY THE DC & CEO, ZP KOLAR (RESPONDENT NO.5) TO THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RDPR DEPARTMENT (RESPONDENT NO.1) VIDE ANNEXURE-G ETC.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking retirement from the case.
2. It is claimed by the Counsel that the memo is signed by the petitioner himself. Hence, memo is placed on record. Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to retire from the case.
3. The matter is listed for the third time for non- compliance of office objections. Counsel for the petitioner having retired from the case, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, petitions stand dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE KK CT-HR