Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chandrapal @ Sua vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|04 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23421 of 2019 Applicant :- Chandrapal @ Sua Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
According to the prosecution case the F.I.R. was lodged against 14 accused persons including the applicant, alleging that on 29.12.2017 they made firing on Police personnel but they saved themselves; the applicant was arrested by the Police and other accused persons were fled away; recovery of some illegal firearm, Buffalo and cartridges were made from their possession.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; this is Police firing case but no injury was found on the body of any of the Police personnel; there is no independent witness against the applicant; the co- accused Danish and Tajuddin @ Raju have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 19.02.2018 and 27.2.02018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5862 of 2018 and 7854 of 2018, copies of which have been taken on record; the role of the applicant is identical to that of the co-accused who have already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity; in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial; he is in jail since 29.12.2017.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail and admitted that the criminal history of four cases against the applicant have been explained, the role of this accused is identical to the role of the accused who have already been enlarged on bail.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and the fact that identically placed co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, it is deemed fit to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Let the applicant Chandrapal @ Sua involved in the Case Crime No. 0547 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 382, 504, 506, 411, 413 I.P.C. and Section 41/102 Cr.P.C., P.S. Patiyali, District Kasganj be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses.
iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court.
iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission, of which applicant is suspected.
v) The applicant shall not directly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade the applicant from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 4.6.2019 Meenu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandrapal @ Sua vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
04 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ram Krishna Gautam
Advocates
  • Ravi Shankar Tripathi