IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.3666/2018 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. CHANDRAMATHI W/O VENKATARAMANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT BASAVANAKERE HOUSE THEKKAR POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT 574241 2. SRI L ANANTHA AITHAL S/O L PARAMESHWAR AITHALA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS HAVING HIS ADDRESS AT NO.152, BLD 93, 1ST FLOOR, KHB COLONY KST III STAGE , BANGALORE 560060 3. SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI C/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.243, LAXMI NIVAS BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR SHIVANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR BANGALORE 560010 4. SRI KRISHNA AITHAL AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS S/O L PARAMESHWAR AITHAL R/AT BAZAR HOUSE THEKKAR POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK D.K. DISTRICT 574241 5. SMT PARVATHI W/O MANU PURANIK, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT PATHAN BUILDING GOKAK POST & TALUK, BELGAUM DISTRICT 591307 6. SRI YAJNESHARA AITHAL AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O L PARAMESHWAR AITHAL RESIDING AT 4 ENG REGT C/O 56, APO 7. SMT INDUMATHI W/O N SRIDHARA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.575/0, AHIMSA MARG, SIDDARTHANAGAR II STAGE, MYSORE 575001 [BY SRI PRASANNA V R., ADV.] ... PETITIONERS AND:
1. SRI.K.SHIVARAMA RAO S/O K ANANTHAYYA AGED MAJOR, OCC: ADVOCATE RESIDING AT ANANDA NIVAS, BEHIND NATARAJ THEATRE, IDDAYA VILLAGE, POST, SURATHKAL, MANGALORE 575014 2. MR SADHU HUSSAIN S/O LATE T HUSSAIN SADU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT G-18/98, 8TH BLOCK, CHOKKABETTU, KIRSHNAPURA, KATIPALLA, SURATHKAL 575014 3. SRI L PARAMESHWARA AITHAL S/O LATE ANANTHAYYA AGED ABOUT 89 YEARS RESIDING AT BAZAR HOUSE THEKKAR POST BELATHANGADY TALUK D.K.DISTRICT 574241 …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI A KESHAVA BHAT, ADV FOR R-1 R-2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 18.11.2017 IN OD No. 196/2006 PSDDRF BY THE LEARNED II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM., MANGALORE, D.K., TRUE COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 18.11.2017 in O.S.No.196/2006 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Mangalore, D.K. ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.196/2006 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR