Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Chandrama Prashad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 21755 of 2016 Applicant :- Chandrama Prashad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajnish Kumar Shahi,Vijai Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ramakant Dubey,Vineet Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Order on Crl. Misc. Correction Application
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to inadvertence following para could not be transcribed:
"The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of one year from the date of production of a certificate copy of this order"
The application is allowed.
The following paragraph be also read after the last paragraph of the order dated 12.7.2018 passed by this Court:
"The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of one year from the date of production of a certificate copy of this order"
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Manish Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandrama Prashad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Rajnish Kumar Shahi Vijai Kumar Tripathi