Court No. - 10
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4422 of 2020 Petitioner :- Chandrakrishna Rohtagi Respondent :- Smt.Umma Rohtagi And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimalendra Kumar Upadhyay,Dhananjay Singh
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be issued to respondents.
The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to issue a direction to the court below to decide the Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 (paper 6C) filed in Original Suit No.900 of 2018 (Chandra Krishna Rohtagi Vs. Umma Rohtagi and another).
It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from the aforesaid suit, a stay application has also preferred by him before court below for grant of interim protection. It is argued that the interim protection is urgently required and prays for early disposal of the stay application.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into merits of the case, the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is disposed of directing the court below to pass appropriate orders on the application Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C filed by the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 6.1.2021 saqlain