Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Chandraketu Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5134 of 2018 Petitioner :- Chandraketu Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui,Mohd. Saeed Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J. Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State.
We do not find any merit in this petition warranting intereference in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018 RPS [Ashok Kumar, J.] [Vikram Nath, J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandraketu Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Vikram Nath
Advocates
  • Mohd Saeed Siddiqui Mohd Saeed Siddiqui

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.