Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Chandrakant vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27002 of 2021 Petitioner :- Chandrakant Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aishwarya Pratap Singh,Harsha Pandey,Harshit Pandey,Munna Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Learned Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection and submitted that present petition is premature as it has been filed only against the proposal dated 12.9.2021. He next submitted that said proposal would be verified by Tehsil Level Committee and thereafter on its report, Sub Divisional Magistrate (in short S.D.M.) shall pass order. Further, it is open for the petitioner to raise objection before the S.D.M., if any against the proposal. Therefore, at this stage, petition may be dismissed as premature.
Learned counsel for the petitioner opposed the submission, but could not dispute the procedure informed by learned Standing Counsel for grant of fair price shop.
Under such facts and circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to petitioner to raise objection before S.D.M.-respondent no.2, if any. In case any such objection is filed, he shall consider the same while passing order on the proposal dated 12.9.2021.
Order Date :- 29.10.2021 Junaid
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandrakant vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 October, 2021
Judges
  • Neeraj Tiwari
Advocates
  • Aishwarya Pratap Singh Harsha Pandey Harshit Pandey Munna Pandey