Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chandrakali vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1566 of 2019 Petitioner :- Chandrakali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mani Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
This writ petition has been filed for issuance of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2-Consolidation Officer, Soraon, Allahabad to decide the restoration application no. 400/215/2016 under Section 9A (2) of U.P.C.H. Act (hereinafter referred to as Act) within stipulated time.
The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the objection under Section 9A (2) of the Act decided vide order dated 26.9.2007 passed by Consolidation Officer. Against that order, a recall application was filed on 17.10.2016, which remain pending till date.
Under these circumstances, respondent no.2-Consolidation Officer, Soraon, Allahabad is directed to decide the restoration application no. 400/215/2016 under Section 9A (2) of the Act as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019 Noman
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandrakali vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Rajiv Joshi
Advocates
  • Mani Shanker Pandey