IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1284/2017 BETWEEN 1. SMT. CHANDRAKALA, W/O. MURGESH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 2. KUMARI VISMAYA, D/O. MURGESH, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN, BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF BEGUR VILLAGE AND HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560 068.
AND ALSO AT SADAHALLI VILALGE, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE – 562 110.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI JAYANTH RANGANNA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI D.S. VIJAYENDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND SRI MURGESH, S/O VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT No.2, YAJAMANE LAYOUT, GANANPPANAHALLI ROAD, BEGUR VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560 068.
AND ALSO AT KRISHNAPURA DAGGI, ANEGUNDI ROAD, SANGAPUR POST, GANGAVATHI TALUK, KOPPAL DISTRICT – 583 227.
(RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2017 PASSED BY THE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE IN CRL.A.No.35/2017 AND ALLOW THE PETITION BY CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 06.11.2014 PASSED BY THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE IN CRL.MISC.No.72/2013.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo of even date seeking dismissal of the revision petition as infructuous.
Memo is placed on record.
For the reasons stated in the memo, the criminal revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE mv