Learned advocate Mr. Kanabar for the applicant submitted that after considering the evidence on record, learned 4th Additional Senior Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Bhavnagar, has passed the order dated 24.2.2009 in Criminal Case No.2349 of 2006, which is just and proper. Against that order, the respondent No.2 - original accused preferred Criminal Appeal No.25 of 2009 and the applicant - original complainant also preferred Criminal Revision Application No.55 of 2009 before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar. The sentence imposed upon the respondent No.2 - original accused is quashed and set aside by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar and revision of the applicant - original complainant is dismissed by order dated 31.5.2011. He submitted that this Revision Application may be allowed.
Learned advocate Mr. Harshit Dantani for Mr. Majmudar, learned advocate for the respondent No.2 submitted that order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar is just and proper and therefore, this Revision is not required to be entertained.
Heard both the parties and perused the application along with papers. Hence, RULE. Learned APP Mr. H.L. Jani waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent No.1 - State.
(Z.K.SAIYED,J.) ynvyas Top