Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chandra Shekhar Parashar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52774 of 2019 Applicant :- Chandra Shekhar Parashar Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sahab Tiwari,Saurabh Tiwari,Sita Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
Sri R.P. Dwivedi, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the first informant, which is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A., learned counsel for the first informant and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has already been arrested and this anticipatory bail application has lost its purpose and has been rendered infructuous, therefore, he does not want to press the same and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.
This anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 CPP/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandra Shekhar Parashar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Sahab Tiwari Saurabh Tiwari Sita Tiwari