Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1403 of 2019 Applicant :- Chandra Bhan Chauhan Opposite Party :- Ambika Chaudhari, Tehsildar Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Kumar
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The applicant has preferred the present contempt application for non-compliance of judgment and order dated 14.12.2017 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 59701 of 2017 (Chandra Bhan Chauhan Vs. State of U.P. And 5 Others). The aforesaid order is quoted below:-
"Heard Sri Alok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.K. Upadhyay, the learned Standing Counsel.
In view of the nature of the order sought to be passed it is not necessary to issue any notice to the respondent no.6.
This petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to remove illegal encroachment alleged to have been made by the respondent no.6 over the Plot No. 252 (Area 0.1820 hct) situated in Village Palia Mafi, Pargana Mahul, Tehsil Phoolpur, District Azamgarh. It is stated that the said plot is shown in the revenue records as "banjar", copy of which has been filed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
Reliance has been placed on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Public Interest Litigation Petition No.63380 of 2012 (Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others) wherein the Division Bench has directed that if the complaints regarding unauthorised occupation over the public ponds or other similar public lands are received by the District Magistrate of a District, he should take all the required actions in view of the law already settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Jagpal Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others reported in (2011) 11 SCC 396. Paragraphs 13, 15, 16, 18, 23 and 24 of Jagpal Singh (supra) read as under:
"13. We find no merit in this appeal. The appellants herein were trespassers who illegally encroached on to the Gram Panchayat land by using muscle power/money power and in collusion with the officials and even with the Gram Panchayat. We are of the opinion that such kind of blatant illegalities must not be condoned. Even if the appellants have built houses on the land in question they must be ordered to remove their constructions, and possession of the land in question must be handed back to the Gram Panchayat. Regularizing such illegalities must not be permitted because it is Gram Sabha land which must be kept for the common use of villagers of the village.
15. In M.I. Builders (P) Ltd. vs. Radhey Shyam Sahu, 1999(6) SCC 464 the Supreme Court ordered restoration of a park after demolition of a shopping complex constructed at the cost of over Rs.100 crores.
16. In Friends Colony Development Committee vs. State of Orissa, 2004 (8) SCC 733 this Court held that even where the law permits compounding of unsanctioned constructions, such compounding should only be by way of an exception. In our opinion this decision will apply with even greater force in cases of encroachment of village common land. Ordinarily, compounding in such cases should only be allowed where the land has been leased to landless labourers or members of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, or the land is actually being used for a public purpose of the village e.g. running a school for the villagers, or a dispensary for them.
18. The present is a case of land recorded as a village pond. This Court in Hinch Lal Tiwari vs. Kamala Devi, AIR 2001 SC 3215 (followed by the Madras High Court in L. Krishnan vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2005(4) CTC 1 Madras) held that land recorded as a pond must not be allowed to be allotted to anybody for construction of a house or any allied purpose. The Court ordered the respondents to vacate the land they had illegally occupied, after taking away the material of the house. We pass a similar order in this case.
23. Before parting with this case we give directions to all the State Governments in the country that they should prepare schemes for eviction of illegal/unauthorized occupants of Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat/Poramboke/Shamlat land and these must be restored to the Gram Sabha/Gram Panchayat for the common use of villagers of the village. For this purpose the Chief Secretaries of all State Governments/Union Territories in India are directed to do the needful, taking the help of other senior officers of the Governments. The said scheme should provide for the speedy eviction of such illegal occupant, after giving him a show cause notice and a brief hearing. Long duration of such illegal occupation or huge expenditure in making constructions thereon or political connections must not be treated as a justification for condoning this illegal act or for regularizing the illegal possession. Regularization should only be permitted in exceptional cases e.g. where lease has been granted under some Government notification to landless labourers or members of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, or where there is already a school, dispensary or other public utility on the land.
24. Let a copy of this order be sent to all Chief Secretaries of all States and Union Territories in India who will ensure strict and prompt compliance of this order and submit compliance reports to this Court from time to time."
No useful purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition pending.
The writ petition is disposed of with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties with a direction to the respondent no.4, Tehsildar, Tehsil- Phoolpur, District Azamgarh to enquire into the matter and pass appropriate orders keeping in mind the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Jagpal Singh (supra) as well as the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court passed in Public Interest Litigation Petition No.63380 of 2012 (Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others) within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is received in his office.
It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merits."
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that a considerable time has already been elapsed but till date no decision has taken in this matter.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, and consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally, permitting the applicant to make fresh representation in this regard before the Tehsildar, Tehsil Phoolpur, District Azamgarh, along with the copy of the order passed by the writ court as well as the order passed today, if such representation is made before the aforesaid Tehsildar, he will pass an appropriate order in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from the date of submission of self attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 30.9.2021 Vikram