Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Chandira vs The State Rep By

Madras High Court|28 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.02.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.4047 of 2017 Chandira ... Petitioner Vs The State Rep by, The Sub- Inspector of Police, Arni Taluk Police Station, Arni, Thiruvannamalai District ... Respondent This criminal original petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to issue suitable direction to the respondent investigate the complaint in Crime no.923/2016 and file final report.
For Petitioner : M/S.Parigopal For respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER The present criminal original petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent police to file a final report in Crime No.923 of 2016.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that as against one Mani, the petitioner has lodged a complaint with the respondent police on 03.11.2016 and the same was registered in Crime No.923 of 2016 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323 IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002. But, till date, final report was not filed. Hence, the present petition.
3. I have heard Mr.Parigopal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.C.Emalias, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court directs the respondent to investigate the case in Crime No.923 of 2016 and file a final report, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly.
28.02.2017 Index:Yes/No mrp To
1. The Sub- Inspector of Police, Arni Taluk Police Station, Arni, Thiruvannamalai District
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.
mrp Crl.O.P.No.4047 of 2017 DATED: 28.02.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandira vs The State Rep By

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2017
Judges
  • V Bharathidasan