Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Chandan vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25004 of 2019 Petitioner :- Chandan Respondent :- State Of U P And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Tariq Maqbool Khan
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Heard.
It appears that numerous applications have been made by the Pradhan of the village complaining of unauthorized occupation over land recorded as Khalihan and land which is reserved for Kanya Pathshaala.
The instant writ petition is not by the Pradhan but by his son.
Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that no complain regarding aforenoted unauthorized occupation has been made by the petitioner.
In my considered opinion, the petitioner has no locus. The person who has been complaining of unauthorized occupation of Gaon Sabha land above, namely, the Pradhan can maintain a writ petition.
This writ petition is dismissed holding that the petitioner has no locus to maintain it.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019 sweta
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandan vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • Anjani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Pankaj Kumar Yadav