Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Chandan Kumar Gupta vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 37657 of 2018 Petitioner :- Chandan Kumar Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mazhar Ullah,Mohd. Afzal Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Heard Sri Mazhar Ullah, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 29.8.2018, registered as case crime No.448 of 2018, under Section 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, P.S. Bhelpur, District Varanasi.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case though no offence as has been mentioned in the F.I.R. is made out against him as he has no role to play in the present crime, hence the present F.I.R. is liable to be quashed.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence and submitted that the present case relates to Public Distribution System scam in which fraud has been committed while distributing the food grains and essential commodities to the card holders by misusing the E-Pos system. The said offence has been committed in the entire State and the involvement of the petitioner in the present case cannot be ruled out. He further submits that the F.I.R. of the present case has been lodged after due approval of the District Magistrate. He further submits that in a similar case this Court while dismissing the petition has passed a detailed order on 6.9.2018 in Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 24575 of 2018 (Amit Kumar Jadaun (Amit) vs. State of U.P. and others).
After having examined the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned FIR, we are of the opinion that the impugned FIR discloses cognizable offence against the petitioner, hence, no interference is called for by this Court in its extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the FIR or for grant of any interim relief to the petitioner.
The petition lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 21.12.2018 AKT
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chandan Kumar Gupta vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Mazhar Ullah Mohd Afzal Ansari