Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Chanai vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25539 of 2020 Petitioner :- Chanai Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
This writ petition has been filed for a relief that the encroachment made by the private respondents over the pond situate at plot no.657, 658 and 659 be removed.
Learned Standing Counsel has opposed the writ petition and submitted that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of filing an application under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Under such circumstances, no interference is warranted. However, if the petitioner files an application under section 67 of the Code within a period of two weeks from today along with a copy of this order, duly certified by the learned counsel, the same shall be decided within a period of two months thereafter.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 7.1.2021 GS (Siddhartha Varma, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chanai vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2021
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Ajay Kumar Yadav