Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Chain Sukh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secre. Of ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 January, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Srivastava, Advocate for respondent-Bank.
Record in question reflects that petitioner had accepted benefit of Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme-2008 and as per the same after extension of aforesaid benefit petitioner was liable to make entire payment good in three instalments. First instalment was to be deposited up till 30.09.2008, second instalment up till 31.03.2009 and third instalment up till 30.06.2009. Total amount which was to be deposited of Rs. 1,86,350/- in aforesaid three instalments.
Petitioner claims that after the benefit of aforesaid scheme has been extended he has deposited Rs. 57,000/- only.
In pith and substance this much has been admitted that relief provided under aforesaid Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme-2008 has not at been complied with.
Before this Court petitioner has contended that he gives up his right under Agricultural Debt Waiver and Debt Relief Scheme-2008 and prepared to deposit entire payment good subject to condition that instalments facilities may be extended to him.
Accordingly this petition is disposed of with the following directions:
(i) Petitioner may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly in concerned Bank/Samiti in six equal instalments. In calculating the arrears the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.
(ii) The first instalment may be deposited within two months from today, and rest of instalments be deposited at the interval of two months. These deposits may be made before the Branch of the Bank from where the loan was taken. In case instalments are deposited in the Bank then half of the recovery charges only be recovered from the petitioner.
(iii) During period the recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance. In case petitioner defaults in depositing any of the instalments within the above stipulated time it will be open to the respondents to start recovery proceedings again by taking coercive process at once to which the petitioner undertakes not to challenge.
(iv) Petitioner may file an application for supply of statement of account alongwith the duly stamped self addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the concerned branch of the Bank will give the same to the petitioner after deposit of first instalment within fifteen days.
(v) This order will not affect any auction if it has already taken place. In that event the petitioner may take appropriate legal proceedings to set aside the auction under U.P.Z.A & L.R. Act and Rules 1952 or file a suit in accordance with law.
(vi) It is clarified that this order will be operative and will not come in way of recovers process in any manner, if any, other writ petition has been filed before this Court against the recovery proceeding for the loan amount.
(vii) Property (agricultural land/tractor) belonging to the petitioner, if attached in connection with recovery proceedings, will be released by the concerned Tahsil authority (unless it has been auctioned) after deposit of first instalment and further moment first instalment is paid the applicant shall also be released.
(viii) if any fact given from the side of the petitioner is found to be incorrect by bank authorities. It will be open for them to move an application for modification/recall of the order.
With the aforesaid writ petition stands disposed of.
Dated 13.01.2010 Dhruv(1379-10)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Chain Sukh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secre. Of ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 January, 2010