Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Central vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|21 June, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned advocate Mr. Sood is permitted to amend the prayer clause by substituting "Revision" in place of "Appeal".
Heard learned advocate for the parties.
By filing this application, the applicant has made prayer to condone delay of 296 days caused in filing Revision Application.
Having regard to the averments made in the application not controverted by filing reply and oral submissions, the applicant has shown sufficient ground to condone delay caused in filing Revision Application.
Hence, the application is allowed. The delay of 296 days caused in filing Revision Application is condoned. Rule made absolute.
(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J) *asma Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Central vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
21 June, 2012