Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C.Chandrasekaran vs S.Uma

Madras High Court|16 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the Tr.C.M.P. was taken up for hearing on 15.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" today (16.02.2017). Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner, either in person or through counsel. Hence, the Tr.C.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
16.02.2017 cs Copy to
1. The Second Additional Principal Family Judge, Chennai.
2. The Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram.
Tr.C.M.P.No.581 of 2015 16.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C.Chandrasekaran vs S.Uma

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 February, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.