IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.9856/2019 (GM – KEB) BETWEEN :
C SQUARE HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT:SRINIVASA NILAYAM, 2ND B CROSS, PNS LAYOUT, SUBANAPALYA EXTENSION, BENGALURU-560 033 KARNATAKA, INDIA, REP BY MANAGING DIRCTOR, Dr. PRAKASH RAMACHANDRA ...PETITIONER (BY SRI SHARATH S. GOWDA, ADV.) AND :
1 . KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED (KPTCL) REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR KAVERI BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009 2 . KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NO.16, C-1, MILLER TANK BUND AREA, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 052 REP BY ITS SECRETARY 3 . BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 002 REP BY THE CHIEF ENGINEER 4 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, PEENYA DIVISION, NO.66, 6TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE, PEENYA, BENGALURU-560058 5 . THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER N-5 SUB-DIVISION, BESCOM, PEENYA, BENGALURU-560 058 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.V.DEVARAJU, ADV. FOR R-1, R-3, R-4 & R-5; SRI B.N.PRAKASH, ADV. FOR R-2.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE NOTIFICATION DATED 26.12.2018 PASSED IN ANNEXURE-P ISSUED BY R-2, IS NOT APPLICABLE TO PETITIONER, AS SANCTION OF ELECTRICITY IS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF NOTIFICATION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5 submits that permanent power supply has been arranged for the premises of the petitioner with Electrical Meter No.N9HT01 by duly conducting P.C.Test following the procedure prescribed under the Regulations as on 2.5.2019 in view of the occupancy certificate submitted by the petitioner in compliance with the Regulations. Hence, the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same.
3. The questions raised in the writ petition has rendered academic in view of the permanent power supply given to the petitioner’s premises.
Writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE Dvr: