Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C Rajendran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Madras High Court|24 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
24.11.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes gsk To
1. The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -9.
2. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District.
3. The special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, MIPL Scheme, Chengalpattu.
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
gsk W.P.No.43738 of 2006 24.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C Rajendran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
24 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban