IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.10920/2016 (GM - CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. C.M. SUJATHA W/O. SRI J.C. MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 2. KUM. SUMA D/O. LATE SRI B.M. CHANNABASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT BASAVESHWARA, TALKIES ROAD, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA – 577 501. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI R.B. SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SMT. C. VYSHALI W/O. SRI VIJEKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT JAYARAJESHWARI NILAYA, TRIVENI ROAD, YESHWANTHPURA, BANGALORE – 560 022.
2. SMT. C. NAVEENA W/O. SRI B.M. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT HUNSMARANAHALLI, BANGALORE – 560 022.
3. SMT. S.K. SUSHEELAMMA W/O. LATE SRI B.M. CHANNABASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 4. SRI C. SANDEEP S/O. LATE SRI B.M. CHANNABASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 5. SRI C. DILIPKUMAR S/O. LATE SRI B.M. CHANNABASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 5 ARE R/O BANGARAKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, TURUVANUR HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT – 577 501.
6. SRI C. PRATHIMA W/O. SRI NARAHARI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. KELAGOTE VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 501.
7. SRI T. PARAMASHIVA S/O. LATE SRI CHANNABASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO.42/2, 3RD CROSS, V.P. EXTENSION, CHITRADURGA – 577 501. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R-1 TO R-6 – SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12.02.2016 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHITRADURGA ON I.A.NO.23 VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC IN O.S.NO.188/2006 AND FRAME THE ADDITIONAL ISSUES.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 12/02/2016 on I.A.No.23 in O.S.No.188/2006 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Chitradurga, ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.188/2006 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE S*