Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C Lakshmipathy vs The Tahsildar And Others

Madras High Court|21 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition and has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
21.09.2017 Index:Yes/No raa To The Tahsildar, Poonamallee, Thiruvallur District.
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
raa W.P.No.38474 of 2005 21.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C Lakshmipathy vs The Tahsildar And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
21 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Dhandapani

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.