Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

C Chenniappan vs The Superintending Engineer

Madras High Court|16 November, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition before this Court.
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
dn 2. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.
16.11.2017 Index : yes/No Internet : Yes dn To The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Erode Circle, Erode, Erode District.
W.P.No.22960 of 2006
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

C Chenniappan vs The Superintending Engineer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 November, 2017
Judges
  • V Parthiban

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.