THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2446 of 2014 DATED: 22.08.2014 Between:
Smt. Bumi Reddy Pranitha and another .. Petitioners and J. Venkatesh .. Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Mr. G.L. Narasimha Rao This Court made the following:
ORDER:
This civil revision petition arises out of order dated 28.04.2014 in I.A.No.10 of 2014 in O.S.No.316 of 2013 on the file of the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.
I have heard Mr. G.L. Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, and perused the record.
The petitioners have filed the above-mentioned suit for eviction of the respondent and also for damages. It is the pleaded case of the petitioners that they have purchased the suit schedule property from the original owner by name N. Madhusudhan Reddy through his purported G.P.A. The said Madhusudhan Reddy has filed O.S.No.1072 of 2012 in the Court of I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, for declaration that the G.P.A. executed by him is null and void and consequently the sale deed executed by the G.P.A. in favour of the petitioners is also null and void. While the said suit is pending, the petitioners have filed the present suit for eviction of the respondent and for damages and they have also filed I.A.No.10 of 2014 under Order XVA of C.P.C. for a direction to the respondent to deposit the arrears of rent and also to deposit the future monthly rents at the rate of Rs.4,000/- per month pending the suit and in default to strike off the defence of the respondent in the suit. The said I.A. was dismissed by the lower Court for default, by the order under revision.
The necessity of adjudication of the application filed by the petitioners on merits is obviated for the reason that this Court, by separate orders passed today, has dismissed C.R.P.Nos.2381, 2408, 2416 and 2418 of 2014 on merits, upholding the orders of the lower Court dismissing the identical I.As. filed by the petitioners on merits. In view of the said orders, no purpose will be served by directing the lower Court to dispose of I.A.No.10 of 2014 on merits.
The civil revision petition accordingly stands dismissed. As a sequel to dismissal of the civil revision petition, C.R.P.M.P.No.3426 of 2014 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 22nd August, 2014 IBL