Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 151 of 2021 Petitioner :- Budhana Respondent :- Naib Tahsildar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing counsel for the State respondent. Perused the record.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.1- Naib Tehsildar, Pawai, Tehsil Phoolpur, District Azamgarh to decide the mutation Case No.T201915060300277 (Budhana Vs. Murata Devi) pending before him.
It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner filed an application on 24.01.2019 under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 before the respondent no.1 which was registered as Case No.T201915060300277 for mutating his name in the revenue records on the basis of sale deed dated 19.01.2019 executed by respondent no.2, which has not yet been decided till date.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.1- Naib Tehsildar, Pawai, Tehsil Phoolpur, District Azamgarh to decide the mutation Case No.T201915060300277 (Budhana Vs. Murata Devi), as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of computerized copy of this order.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall act accordingly without waiting for submission of the certified copy of this order.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.1.2021 P.S.Parihar