Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

B.Sultan Mohideen vs Union Bank Of India

Madras High Court|27 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matters were taken up for hearing on 22.02.2017, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matters were directed to be posted on 24.02.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2. Even today (27.02.2017), when the matters are called, there is no representation for the petitioners either in person or through counsel. Hence, these Tr.C.M.Ps are dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition are closed.
27.02.2017 srn To
1. The VIII Assistant City Civil Court Judge, Chennai
2. The Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Poonamallee.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn Tr.C.M.P.Nos.622 to 626 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 ( 5 Mps) 27.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

B.Sultan Mohideen vs Union Bank Of India

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2017