Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

B.Rukumaniammal vs 3 The Tahsildar

Madras High Court|13 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.Era. Premnath, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry pursuant to the communications of the 3rd respondent dated 06.06.2016 and 21.09.2016 and issue patta in the name of the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that it would be suffice to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 19.04.2016 and 08.09.2016, for the issuance of patta.
4. Mr.Era. Premnath, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents submitted that the 3rd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representations and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representations dated 19.04.2016 and 08.09.2016, and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
13.09.2017 Index: Yes/No Rj To 1 The District Collector Tirupur, Tirupur District.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

B.Rukumaniammal vs 3 The Tahsildar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 September, 2017