Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Braham Dev vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 48
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15082 of 2019 Petitioner :- Braham Dev Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yadavendra Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhishek Sharma,Santosh Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Sri Abhishek Sharma, learned counsel for respondent-Bank.
Learned counsel for the petitioner disputes that the amount being claimed by the Bank to have been sanctioned towards the loan is not correct.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that petitioner was sanctioned a loan of Rs.42,840/- only, which was repaid to the Bank in the year 2017 and as per the statement of the petitioner, there are no dues against him.
Sri Abhishek Sharma, learned counsel for respondent- Bank disputes the above contention of learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that he was sanctioned a total amount of Rs.90,000/- as loan and not Rs.42,840/- as claimed by the petitioner.
The dispute being raised before this Court is on factual nature. The petitioner is at liberty to file suit or avail any other remedy available to him in accordance with law, within a period of two months.
For a period of two months, no recovery shall be effected against the petitioner by the Bank.
With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 Ruchi Agrahari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Braham Dev vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Yadavendra Dwivedi