Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Birendra Rawat vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 31724 of 2017 Petitioner :- Birendra Rawat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shantanu Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned Standing Counsel fairly concedes that in light of the disclosures made in paragraphs 11 and 12 of the counter affidavit, the impugned order cannot be sustained since the petitioner has continued to work right up to 2005 and even thereafter. In view thereof, he prays for the matter being remanded to the respondent No. 4 for reconsideration of the claim of the petitioner for regularization in accordance with law and the relevant statutory rules.
Accordingly and in light of the statement so made, this writ petition stands allowed. The impugned order dated 26 April 2017 is hereby quashed. In consequence, the matter is remitted to the fourth respondent for reconsideration of the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 LA/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Birendra Rawat vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Shantanu Kumar Pandey