Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Bindu Yadav @ Bindu Bind vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 4
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24917 of 2019 Applicant :- Bindu Yadav @ Bindu Bind Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Shish Ram,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in case crime No.110 of 2019, under Sections 419, 420 & 406 IPC, Police Station Nandganj District Ghazipur, with a prayer to enlarge her on bail.
It is submission by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicant is a lady and has no previous criminal history. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, she shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Lastly, it is submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 12.5.2019.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant, but could not point out anything material to the contrary.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made, without commenting upon merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant being a lady, is entitled to be released on bail.
Let applicant Bindu Yadav @ Bindu Bind be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following additional conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-
i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through her counsel. In case of her absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against her under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure her presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against her, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against her in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 21.6.2019 Hasnain
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bindu Yadav @ Bindu Bind vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 June, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Bhatia
Advocates
  • Ram Shish Ram Pradeep Kumar