1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bilal vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 October, 2018


Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39714 of 2018 Applicant :- Bilal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Moeez Uddin Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Moeez Uddin, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA for the State and perused the material brought on record.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is further submitted the present bail is of added section bail, the applicant has already been granted bail in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 30968 of 2018 in same crime no. i.e. 156 of 2018, under sections 377, 511, 342, 506 I.P.C. and Section 7/8 POCSO Act vide order dated 16.08.2018 but during the investigation the Investigating Officer of the said case has added section 9/18 POCSO Act in the present case. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. Further submission is that applicant who is in jail since 13.06.2018 has no other criminal history and there is also no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicant also undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any view on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant Bilal be released on bail in Case Crime No. 156 of 2018, under Section 9/18 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Police Station- Kath, District- Moradabad on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed after release.
(ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities. (iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the present case and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Alakh Alok Srivastava Vs. Union of India and another reported in AIR 2018 (SC) 2004, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 12.10.2018 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Bilal vs State Of U P


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

12 October, 2018
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
  • Moeez Uddin