Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bhura vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7911 of 2018 Petitioner :- Bhura Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Prakash Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Ram Prakash Vishwakarma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
Dispute in this writ petition is of apprehended dispossession from private respondents. Remedy, if any, is to file an appropriate suit subject to advise, before the competent Court.
No good ground is made out to entertain this writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 N.S.Rathour
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhura vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Ram Prakash Vishwakarma

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.