Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Bhupendra Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14321 of 2019 Applicant :- Bhupendra Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Jaysingh Yadav,Nanhe Lal Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Nanhe Lal Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant in length and detail as well as the learned A.G.A. for the opposite party.
This is the second bail application. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected, vide order dated 30.1.2019. Mr. Nanhe Lal Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant has urged that this Court, vide order dated 30.1.2019 had categorically directed that the trial be concluded within a period of six months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. It is then submitted that the incident occurred on 19.9.2018. Inquest of the deceased was conducted on 19.9.2018. Thereafter on 19.9.2018, the father-in-law of the deceased submitted an application before the concerned Police Station that his daughter-in-law has committed suicide. Four days thereafter, F.I.R. was lodged on 23.9.2018. There is no explanation for the delay in lodging of the F.I.R.
So far as the first submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is concerned, it may be noted that from the perusal of the certified copy of the order sheet, it is apparent that the accused himself had not appeared before the Court concerned on a number of occasions and on three occasions, the Court was not available. As such, non conclusion of the trial within a period of six months as earlier directed by the order dated 30.1.2019 cannot be said to be a deliberate non compliance by the Court below.
So far as the second point is concerned, the plea was clearly available to the applicant at the time of argument of the first bail application. Since no new or good ground has been made out to allow the second bail application, the same is, accordingly, rejected.
However, the Court below is directed to proceed with the trial with all expedition without granting any unnecessary adjournment to the parties.
Order Date :- 30.7.2019/HSM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhupendra Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2019
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Jaysingh Yadav Nanhe Lal Tripathi