Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bhupendra Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 15
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16497 of 2017 Applicant :- Bhupendra Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Kumar Mishra,Praveen Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Alpika Srivastava,Neeraj Srivastava
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A., for the State. Perused the record.
This application under Secton-482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed praying for quashing of the criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.131 of 2017 (State vs Sunny and others) arising out of Case Crime No.251 of 2016, under Sections-147, 448, 323, 504, 354 (B) of I.P.C., Police Station-Ghaziabad Kotwali, District-Ghaziabad, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.7, Ghaziabad.
Learned counsel for the applicants contended that from the material brought on the record, no offence is disclosed against the applicants. The present prosecution launched against the applicants is wholly mala fide as such, the present proceedings are an abuse of the process of the court.
Learned A.G.A. contended that there is no illegality in passing impugned order by the trial court.
From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case, at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants.
In view of the above, the prayer for quashing the entire proceedings of the aforesaid case is refused.
However, none of the aforesaid offences against applicants is punishable with imprisonment for more than seven years. All the materials relevant for disposal of bail application is available on record before trial court/court concerned.
In view of order passed by this Court in Smt. Sakeena and another Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in 2018 (2) ACR 2190, it is directed that in case the applicants file their bail application, prayer for their bail shall be considered and decided on the same day. If for any reason it is not possible to decide the regular bail application on the same day, then prayer for interim bail shall be considered and decided on the same day.
For a period of 60 days from today or till they surrender and apply for bail, whichever, is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants.
With the above directions, this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C., is disposed of. Order Date :- 28.11.2018 Jaswant
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhupendra Singh And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2018
Judges
  • Umesh Chandra Tripathi
Advocates
  • Satyendra Kumar Mishra Praveen Mishra