Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bhuaidhar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 50407 of 2003 Petitioner :- Bhuaidhar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shree Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
“(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the pension to the petitioner regularly.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhuaidhar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Shree Prakash Singh