Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bhoora And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29701 of 2018 Applicant :- Bhoora And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Counter affidavit filed on behalf of State, is taken on record.
Vakalatnama filed by Sri M.P.S. Chauhan, learned counsel on behalf of informant, is taken on record.
Heard Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri M.P.S. Chauhan, learned counsel on behalf of opposite party and Sri Sajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the material brought on record.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that applicants are innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. There is a property dispute between the parties. No grievous injuries has been caused to the complainant and his son. All the injuries found on the body of the injured were simple in nature. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. Further submission is that applicant who is in jail since 06.07.2018 have no other criminal history and there is also no possibility of his either fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Applicants also undertakes that they will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned counsel for opposite party as well as learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any view on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicants Bhoora and Bablu be released on bail in Case Crime No. 208 of 2018, under Sections 452, 307, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Aligarh on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicants will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed after release.
(ii) The applicants will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever. (iii) The applicants will not indulge in any unlawful activities. (iv) The applicants will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicants to prison.
Order Date :- 25.9.2018 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhoora And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 September, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Sanjay Mishra