Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Bhoopram vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40581 of 2019 Applicant :- Bhoopram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
The present anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.457 of 2019 u/s 376, 377, 342, 323, 506 IPC and 3/4 DP Act and Section 9/10 Children Marriage Prohibition Act and Section 3/4 POCSO Act PS Kosikalan District Mathura.
I have perused the FIR as well as the order by means of which the anticipatory bail application has been rejected by the court below.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the impugned FIR and looking to the statement of the girl under Section 164 CrPC and the fact that the girl is minor aged about 13 years only and also looking to the seriousness of the allegation as made in the FIR, gravity of offence and the severity of punishment, no case for grant of any indulgence is made out.
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 30.9.2019 SP
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhoopram vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2019
Judges
  • Vipin Sinha
Advocates
  • Pankaj Sharma