Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Bhola Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8814 of 2021 Applicant :- Bhola Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arunima Singh,Ravish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Ravish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Bhola Yadav, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 546 of 2020, under Sections - 406 and 420 I.P.C., Police Station - Rohaniya, District - Varanasi, during pendency of trial.
3. In view of the direct fact allegation having been made in the FIR constituting offence as disclosed, at present, it is difficult to exercise discretion for grant of anticipatory bail in favour of the applicant.
4. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected, leaving it open to the applicant to apply for regular bail, which application when filed may be dealt with on its own merit as expeditiously as possible, without being prejudiced by any observation made in this order.
Order Date :- 8.4.2021 Abhilash
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhola Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Arunima Singh Ravish Kumar Singh