Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bhola Nath Chaudhary vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9449 of 2018 Petitioner :- Bhola Nath Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam,Yogendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The instructions supplied by learned Standing Counsel are taken on record.
Sri Vijay Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous for the reason that the suspension order has been revoked.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Brijesh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhola Nath Chaudhary vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Vijay Gautam Yogendra Kumar Mishra

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.