Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Bhimashi Laxman Jarkiholi vs Union Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|07 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Next > IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.45469/2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
BHIMASHI LAXMAN JARKIHOLI, SON OF SHRI LAXMAN JARKIHOLI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.1134, LAXMI NIWAS, KUVEMPU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-591108.
KARNATAKA.
AND:
... PETITIONER (BY SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI – 110 001.
2. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, E-WING, 2ND FLOOR, KENDRIYA SADAN, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560034.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ANUPAMA HEGDE, CGC) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DECLARING THAT SECTION 164[2][a] OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2013, THE LIST OF THE DIRECTORS DISPLAYED BY THE RESPONDENT FURNISHED AT ANNEXURE-H SERIES AND THE PRESS RELEASE DATED 06/09/2017 AT ANNEXURE-G, DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS OF COMPANIES IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IS IN VIOLATION AND IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF PART III OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA; AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Next >
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhimashi Laxman Jarkiholi vs Union Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
07 August, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe