Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Bhavnaben vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|25 June, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Rule, Mr.Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of notice of rule for respondent - State.
2. The instant application is filed by the applicant-lady-accused seeking regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with D.C.B. Police Station, District-Vadodara C.R.No. I-16/2011 regarding the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 170 r/w Section 114 of the IPC.
3. Mr. Havewalla, learned advocate for the applicant-lady accused took me through the FIR and submitted that the only role attributed to the applicant is that allegedly the main accused no. 1 Rajesh, on his mobile phone which came to be handed-over to the complainant and the complainant allegedly talked with the applicant-lady accused. It is submitted that there was no direct dealing between the complainant and the applicant-lady accused persons.
4. Mr.
Kodekar, learned APP for the respondent- State.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, so also considering the relevant parts of the FIR and the role attributed to the applicant-lady accused, this Court is of the opinion that the application deserves to be granted.
6. Learned counsel for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.
7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. being D.C.B. Police Station, District-Vadodara C.R.No. I-16/2011, on executing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
(c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;
(d) not leave India without prior permission of the trial Court concerned;
(e) furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court.
8. The Authorities will release the applicant only if not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.
9. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the trial Court concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case.
11. For modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions herein above, the applicant will be at liberty to approach the concerned Court and such Court shall decide the application for modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions of this order in accordance with law.
12. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
13. Rule is made absolute accordingly. The application is disposed of.
14. Direct service is permitted.
(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.) Ashish N.
Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhavnaben vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
25 June, 2012