1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Bhavana Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 October, 2018


Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18887 of 2005 Petitioner :- Smt. Bhavana Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.D.Triphathi,V.K. Singh
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11.2.05 passed by respondent no. 2 (Annexure No.4) to this writ petition.
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents not to interfere in peaceful functioning of the petitioner as a Shiksha Mitra in Primary Pathshala of Jahanpur, Block Rajpura, District Badaun.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.10.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Smt Bhavana Yadav vs State Of U P And Others


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

11 October, 2018
  • Sudhir Agarwal
  • Mithilesh Kumar Tiwari