Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Bharti vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|20 June, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

By filing this application, the applicant wife has made prayer to condone delay of 138 days caused in filing Revision Application.
I have heard learned advocate Mr. NL Ramnani for the applicant. Rule is served to Opponent no. 2 but none has appeared. I have also heard learned APP Ms. CM Shah for opponent no. 1.
Having regard to the averments made in the application not controverted by filing reply and oral submissions, the applicant has explained the delay caused in filing the Revision Application. Hence, this application is required to be allowed.
In the result, the application is allowed. The delay caused in filing revision application is condoned. Rule made absolute.
(BANKIM.N.MEHTA, J) *asma Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bharti vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
20 June, 2012