Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bharthu Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26591 of 2018 Petitioner :- Bharthu Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding or directing respondent no. 2 to conduct fair investigation by independent authority in NCR No. 9197/2016 u/ss. 406, 498, 392, 411 IPC, PS. Kerakat, District Jaunpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the informant of the case and an NCR was lodged by him against respondent no.4 and though the Magistrate has ordered for investigation u/s. 155 (2) CrP.C but the same has not been concluded.
As the matter is pending investigation, we are not inclined to interfere with the same.
However, it is open for the petitioner to approach the Magistrate concerned for appropriate orders.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh-I, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 24.9.2018 Madhurima
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bharthu Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 September, 2018
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Dharmendra Kumar Singh