Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bharthal Sonkar vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 33
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6276 of 2018 Petitioner :- Bharthal Sonkar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kailash Nath Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amish Kumar Srivastava,Suresh Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenges judgment and decree dated 15.01.2018 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Jaunpur in Original Suit No. 938 of 2014.
It is well settled that against an ex parte judgment and decree, the party aggrieved could either file an appeal under Section 96 of the C.P.C. or an application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C.
Under the circumstances, this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is misconceived and is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 31.10.2018 Sunil Kr Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bharthal Sonkar vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 October, 2018
Judges
  • Manoj Misra
Advocates
  • Kailash Nath