Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bharat Singh And Others vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 September, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 45
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34020 of 2018 Applicant :- Bharat Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Pratap Singh,Amit Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The argument is that the applicants are not named in the first information report. After the present implication applicant No.1 has been implicated in 12 cases and applicant Nos.2 & 3 have been implicated in 11 cases. The applicants have no prior criminal history and are in jail since 28.5.2018.
On the other hand learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018)3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicants have made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicants Bharat Singh, Ashok Singh and Arun Kumar involved in Case Crime No.136 of 2018, under Sections 457, 380, 411, I.P.C, Police Station Parashurampur, District Basti be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicants will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicants will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicants will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicants shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected of the commission of which they are suspected.
5. The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Order Date :- 6.9.2018 T. Sinha
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bharat Singh And Others vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 September, 2018
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Sudhanshu Pratap Singh Amit Kumar Singh