1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Bhanu Pratap Gihar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 April, 2019


Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 17612 of 2019 Applicant :- Bhanu Pratap Gihar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Amar Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Sri Amar Bahadur Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Om Prakash Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Bhanu Pratap Gihar with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 911 of 2018, under Sections 272, 273, 420 IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District-Mainpuri, during pendency of trial.
It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The co-accused-Pradeep Pal has been granted bail by another Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.04.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14928 of 2019, copy of which order has been passed on to the Court today is kept on record and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is languishing in jail since 29.08.2018. The applicant does not have any previous criminal history. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means.
Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.
Having considered the submissions of the parties and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties (Rs. One Lac each) (One should be of a family member) before the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 29.4.2019 JK Yadav
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Bhanu Pratap Gihar vs State Of U P


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

29 April, 2019
  • S Manju Rani Chauhan
  • Amar Bahadur Maurya