IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION Nos.28902-28904/2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA, W/O GOPAL, AGED 36 YEARS, NO 33/1, KANAKAGIRI, SOYAGE FARM ROAD, MYSORE – 570008.
2. SMT. ROOPASHRI, W/O J ARASCHOOL, AGED 32 YEARS, NO 20E, VENKATADRI NILAYA, ASHOKAPURAM ROAD, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, SRIRAMPURA, MYSORE – 570023.
3. K ASHISH KUMAR, S/O KUNNEGOWDA, AGED 35 YEARS, NO 234, 2ND CROSS, SIDDI VINAYAKA LAYOUT, RAJKUMAR ROAD, TEACHERS COLONY, MYSORE – 570029.
... PETITIONERS (BY SMT. PRIYAMVADA J, ADVOCATE FOR SRI AJIT KALYAN, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, KAVERI BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BENGALURU – 560009.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. PRATHIMA HONNAPURA, AGA) THESE WRIT PETITION ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 18.06.2018 VIDE ANENXURE-F AND DIRECT THE R-2 TO ALLOT THE AVAILABLE VACANT LIG AND MIG SITES TO THE PETITIONERS.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Smt. Priyamvada J., learned counsel for the petitioners.
Smt. Prathima Honnapura, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petitions are admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In these petitions, the petitioners inter alia seek for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners dated 18.6.2018 vide Annexure-F.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the writ petitions may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 18.6.2018 submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioners shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioners, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
7. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE MD